A lot or even more? - Resolution
Hardly
any other aspect of digital photography causes as much debate as the importance
of "resolution". While this is justifiable to some extent, it's also
comparable to the desire of car drivers for more and more horsepower, despite
chronically congested roads ...
To understand this term, you first have to call to mind the structure of a digital photo. It is made up what are known as picture elements or "pixels", which are the smallest building blocks of this kind of image.
A vast number of these pixels are pieced together like a mosaic to produce the digital photo - rather like a piece of graph paper on which you can fill in individual boxes with a pencil and then recognize a picture-like pattern when you look at it from a distance.
CCD sensor
and pixels
The
resolution of a "graph-paper picture" like this is equal to the number
of boxes on the paper.
The situation is similar with digital cameras: with the help of an enormous number of minute, light-sensitive photodiodes, known as CCD elements, they:
The more of these photodiodes there are on the sensor of a digital camera, the higher its resolution becomes. In the technical data, this resolution is either described by way of an exact number of pixels (e.g. 2,048 x 1,536 pixels), or the value is simplified by stating the number in millions of pixels. In computer jargon, the word "mega" is used to indicate a million.
Having
worked our way through so much technical language, we know now that a 3-megapixel
camera is a model whose recording sensor contains:
If you multiply these values, you get the magic number (exactly 3,145,728).
In practice, this simply means that the camera can break down any motif you point its lens at, be it the Eiffel Tower or a ladybug, into 3.1 million mosaic tiles.
If you photograph a motif of this kind with a 3-megapixel camera, this resolution has enough reserves to make even small details visible.
![]()
© Copyright 2003, DCS Ltd
To contact DCS Click here
Last updated on
Wednesday 9 July, 2003 10:00